IN RE ORDER AS TO SANCTIONS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District issued this order establishing a sanctions framework to address attorney misconduct before the court. The court identified specific examples of misconduct and available sanctions, emphasizing that professional misconduct should be punished at the attorney's expense rather than through costly reversals and mistrials.
The court adopted a comprehensive sanctions order establishing examples of attorney misconduct subject to discipline (including spurious motions, deficient briefs, misrepresentations, and frivolous appeals) and available sanctions (ranging from reprimands to contempt orders and referral to the Florida Bar), to be imposed on attorneys guilty of willful misconduct before the court.
[1] Judges have a duty to take or initiate appropriate disciplinary measures against a lawyer for unprofessional conduct of which the judge may become aware.
[2] Professional misconduct by an attorney should be addressed by professional sanctions, not at the expense of citizens through reversal and mistrial.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[I]t is appropriate that individual professional misconduct not be punished at the citizens' expense, by reversal and mistrial, but at the attorney's expense, by professional sanction.”
Establishes the court's rationale for imposing sanctions on attorneys rather than reversing cases, citing Bertolotti v. State.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe court observed that various acts of misconduct by a minority of lawyers practicing before it had come to its attention. The court found this misco…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conduct Prejudicial To The Administration Of Justice cases and more on FLexlaw
There have come to the attention of the court various acts of misconduct by a small minority of the lawyers practicing before this court. It is an affront to the judicial process that any such misconduct occurs, and it would be a disservice to the vast majority of lawyers if the misconduct of a few were to go unnoticed.
This order is issued in recognition of Canon 3 B.(3), Code of Judicial Conduct, which provides, “A judge should take or initiate appropriate disciplinary measures against a judge or lawyer for unprofessional conduct of which the judge may become aware.” “[I]t is appropriate that individual professional misconduct not be punished at the citizens’ expense, by reversal and mistrial, but at the attorney’s expense, by professional sanction.” Bertolotti v. State, 476 So. 2d 130, 133-34 (Fla.1985).
Notice is hereby given that appropriate sanctions will be imposed upon an attorney who is guilty of wilfull misconduct before this court. See Winstead v. Adams, 363 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Examples of types of misconduct which may subject an attorney to sanctions are:
1. Filing spurious motions for the purpose of delay and/or harrassment of the opposition.
2. No brief filed.
3. Brief filed without record references or otherwise without compliance with appellate rules.
4. No brief filed with record references despite prior striking of brief by this court with leave to amend.
5. Misrepresentation to this court
a. of fact (e.g., why a brief was late), including misrepresentation by silence.
b. misrepresentation of law, including omission of directly adverse authority in violation of DR 7-106(B)(l), Code of Professional Responsibility.
6. Filing a frivolous appeal.
7. Failure to comply with an order of court.
Examples of types of sanctions which may be considered are:
1. Dismissal of appeal.
2. Order of Contempt.
3. Striking of brief.
4. Reprimand, public or private. A public reprimand may, in the court’s discretion, be published in the Southern Reporter. 5. Assessment of costs and of fees of opposing counsel for time expended by reason of the misconduct. .
6. Fine.
7. Warning that future misconduct will subject the attorney to contempt proceeding.
8. Notice to the attorney’s clients of the misconduct.
9. Reference of the matter to the Florida Bar or to an appropriate grievance committee.
10. Direction to state attorney to initiate proceedings against the attorney in accordance with Integration Rule 11.14.
In particular cases a show cause order may be issued ordering that the attorney show cause in writing and thereafter at a hearing before this court why certain sanctions should not be imposed.
The name of each attorney against whom a sanction has been imposed will be recorded with the court and circulated to all judges of the court so that any repetition of misconduct may be noted and sanctions increased accordingly.
Attention is called to DR 1-103, Code of Professional Responsibility, which provides, “a lawyer possessing unprivileged knowledge of a clear violation of DR 1-102 should report such knowledge to a tribunal or other authority empowered to investigate or act upon such violation.” Notice is hereby given that misconduct which calls for consideration by this court of the imposition of sanctions in accordance with this order is considered to be “conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice” within the meaning of DR 1-102(A)(5).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Alton (Bud) Parker v. Baker, 499 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…nd must deal with other attorneys’ motions which do not comply, may question what the court will do if it receives motions, of this kind in the future. This is notice that that question is under this court’s consideration. See Order as to Sanctions, 495 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). If motions for rehearing in violation of 9.330(a) become the rule, rather than the exception, the fear might arise that all motions for rehearing would, at least initially, be viewed with skepticism by a busy court. Avoidance of…
-
Merkle v. Guardianship OF Robert J. Jacoby, 912 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…Question of Sanctions This court has the authority to sanction Mr. Merkle for his failure to notify us immediately of the settlement he reached with the Department as required by rule 9.350(a). See Fla. R.App. P. 9.410; In re Order as to Sanctions, 495 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Our research has not disclosed a prior case in which a Florida appellate court has sanctioned counsel for failing to immediately notify the court of the settlement of a pending case. However, other appellate courts have viewed su…
-
Moose v. State, 519 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…rity to dismiss appeals upon the failure of an appellant to abide by the periods set forth in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure for the accomplishment of acts associated with perfecting and pursuing an appeal. See In Re Order As To Sanctions, 495 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). In the interest of justice and toward the end that rights are neither lost nor impaired as the result of an attorney’s delinquency, which is at times explainable and justifiable, we generally seek to avoid the harsh result of dis…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bertolotti v. State, 476 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1985)
- Winstead v. Adams, 363 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)