UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
MARIA YANIBE MONTILLA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
ORDER
By order filed April 20, 1989, the mandate was stayed in this cause pending a decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Munoz-Flores, 863 F. 2d 654 (9th Cir.1988). The Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Munoz-Flores, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1964, 109 L.Ed.2d 384 (1990), reverses the decision in Munoz-Flores. Accordingly, our opinion in the above cause at 870 F. 2d 549 (9th Cir.1989) is amended by striking all of part Y and substituting the following:
V
The district court ordered Montilla to pay a mandatory special assessment of $50 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(A) (198.4). This assessment was proper. Munoz-Flores, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1964, 109 L.Ed.2d 384 (1990).
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Caperell, 938 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1991)
-
Gentile v. The Cnty. OF Suffolk, 926 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1991)
-
United States v. Cortez, 973 F.2d 764 (9th Cir. 1992)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Munoz-Flores, 495 U.S. 385 (U.S. 1990)
- Hocking v. Mayleee Dubois & Vitousek & Dick Realtors, Inc., 863 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1988)
- United States v. German Munoz-Flores, 863 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1988)
- United States v. Montilla, 870 F.2d 549 (9th Cir. 1989)