ALL CLEAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

THOMAS STRACHAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Velazquez v. State, 561 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …e state’s contention, however, this conflict on the facts does not require that the motion to dismiss be denied because (a) the conflict is on a non-material fact, and (b) the conflict is resolved in favor of the state’s version. See State v. Carda, 495 So. 2d 912, 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Fox v. State, 384 So. 2d 226, 227 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 392 So. 2d 1379 (Fla.1980); Ellis v. State, 346 So. 2d 1044, 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 352 So. 2d 175 (Fla.1977). . Thacker v. State, 103 Ga.App. 36, 11…
• State v. Alejander Perez, 543 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …presence in advance of trial when the sole purpose for doing so appears to have been to familiarize the trial court with the facts of the case, rather than to rule on any pending motion or other legal matter before the court. Compare State v. Carda, 495 So. 2d 912, 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (error to grant a dismissal for the state’s inability or unwillingness to produce police officers for questioning under oath as “state is not obliged, on pain of dismissal, to produce witnesses for deposition or trial”); Stat…
• State v. Garth Bailey, 508 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …State v. Hunwick, 446 So. 2d 214, 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); State v. Pentecost, 397 So. 2d 711, 712 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). “If the defendant is thereafter entitled to a directed verdict or acquittal, each party has been given its due.” State v. Carda, 495 So. 2d 912, 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). [*1270] In the present case, viewing all inferences in favor of the state, we feel the facts adduced constitute a prima facie case for the crime charged. Accordingly, we reverse. LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.…