LYNETTE ALLGOOD, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE ELYRIA UNITED METHODIST HOME, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
The court having received two petitions for rehearing en banc, and the petitions having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and no judge of this court having requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petitions for rehearing have been referred to the original hearing panel.
Upon consideration of the appellees’ petitions for rehearing en banc, the panel believes that the petitions have merit as to one point, and should be granted to that extent. In Minority Employees v. Tenn. Dept. of Emp. Sec., 901 F. 2d 1327, 1336 (6th Cir.1990) (en banc), our court held that the holding that all appellants must be named in a notice of appeal was to be applied retroactively. The notice of appeal in this case cannot be distinguished from the notice in Minority Employees.
Accordingly, the appellees’ motions for rehearing en banc are granted to the extent that the appeal is dismissed as to all appellants except the named appellant Lynette Allgood.
In all other respects the petitions are denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ulric Paul Giddings v. Chandler, 979 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1992)
-
Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1993)
-
Celedonio Santana v. Chandler, 961 F.2d 514 (5th Cir. 1992)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Minority Emps. OF THE Tenn. Dep't OF Emp. Sec. v. State OF Tenn., 901 F.2d 1327 (6th Cir. 1990)