UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

TED H. KIMBALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1990-09-21

No. 87-1392

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

914 F.2d 1386 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1990) Negative Treatment

Cited by 38 cases

Opinion of the Court

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

Clair B. Pratt v. Petroleum Prod. Mgmt., 920 F.2d 651 (10th Cir. 1990)
Worlds v. Dep't OF Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 929 F.2d 591 (11th Cir. 1991)
Hubbert v. City OF Moore, 923 F.2d 769 (10th Cir. 1991)

Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. TED H. KIMBALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

TED H. KIMBALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT