WILLIE CLISBY, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLIE JONES, WARDEN, HOLMAN UNIT, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE
WILLIE CLISBY, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT,
CHARLIE JONES, WARDEN, HOLMAN UNIT, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE
920 F.2d 720
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.*
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested , a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clisby v. Jones, 960 F.2d 925 (11th Cir. 1992)…11th Cir.1990). After withdrawing its original opinion, the panel issued a new opinion that reached the same result on different grounds. Clisby v. Jones, 907 F. 2d 1047 (11th Cir.1990). We then agreed to rehear the case en banc, Clisby v. Jones, 920 F. 2d 720 (11th Cir.1990), and now reverse the district court’s order granting habeas relief and affirm it on all other grounds. We further remand the case to the district court for a disposition of all remaining claims. Part I of this opinion discusses pet…
-
Clisby v. State OF Ala., 26 F.3d 1054 (11th Cir. 1994)…d.2d 674 (1984). The case involves a brutal murder committed by a person who had killed before. The detailed facts are set out in two earlier opinions. See Clisby v. Jones, 907 F. 2d 1047 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) vacated, reh’g, en banc, granted, 920 F. 2d 720 (11th Cir.1990), and Clisby v. Jones, 960 F. 2d 925 (11th Cir.1992) (en bane) 0Clisby I). Clisby mainly argues that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective at sentencing for not obtaining additional testimony from mental health experts. Defen…
-
Burger v. Zant, 984 F.2d 1129 (11th Cir. 1993)…until twenty-one months after the state habeas corpus court’s original order, which was filed October 14, 1987. Thus, the court correctly found Burger’s amendment untimely. . The Eleventh Circuit subsequently vacated Clisby. See Clisby v. Jones, 920 F. 2d 720 (1990). . We address Burger’s final issue regarding procedural bar doctrines in our discussion concerning each individual issue. . Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985) held that when a defendant’s sanity is an importa…