REGINALD JOE FORWARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
REGINALD JOE FORWARD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
497 So. 2d 726
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1986)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Weems v. State, 469 So. 2d 128 (Fla.1985); Sabb v. State, 479 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
JOANOS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. ST. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. & Ray E. Ulmer, Jr., 547 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…this action was filed in 1975, a direct action against an insured’s carrier was permissible. Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1969), superseded by § 627.7262, Fla.Stat. (1983). . In Continental Casualty Co. v. First Arlington Inv. Corp., 497 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), this court found that CNA’s policy limit was not $250,000. . See, Farmers Mutual v. Drane, 383 S.W. 2d 714 (Mo.1964); Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 136 So. 2d 724 (La. 2d Ct.App.1961); Benroth v. Continental Casualty Co., 13…
-
Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Wendt, 205 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir. 2000)…he case to the trial court for a determination as to whether the attorney had committed one act of negligence or two "separate, unrelated acts of negligence.” Second, Defendant cite Continental Casualty Company v. First Arlington Investment Corp., 497 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), which also involved a Lawyer’s Liability Insurance Policy. In this case, however, the policy language did not include the term "related.” Rather, it provided that the limit of liability for "each claim” would be "a total limit…
Authorities Cited
- Weems v. State, 469 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 1985)
- Sabb v. State, 479 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)