ROBERT WILLIS BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1986-11-13
No. 85-1533
ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.
497 So. 2d 933 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the trial judge's refusal to sequester the jury overnight after deliberations began was not reversible error per se.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant was convicted of manslaughter. During deliberations, the trial court denied the defendant's request to sequester the jury overnight.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Justice.

DAUKSCH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a manslaughter conviction. On appeal is the judge’s refusal to sequester the jury overnight after it had begun its deliberations. The court denied the timely sequestration request of appellant.

The issue here is virtually the same as in Taylor v. State, 481 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), so on that authority we affirm1 the conviction and certify the same question of great public importance which we certified in Taylor, viz:

After submission of the cause to the jury for deliberations in the trial of a non-capital case, is it reversible error per se for a trial court to authorize the jury to separate overnight, or for some other definite time fixed by the court, and then reassemble and continue its consideration of a verdict?

The judgment is affirmed and the question is certified.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur. . This author dissented in Taylor and would maintain that position but for the precedent set in Taylor, to which he feels bound.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brooks v. State, 507 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1987)
    …PER CURIAM. Brooks’ conviction for manslaughter was affirmed in Brooks v. State, 497 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). The district court of appeal certified the following question: AFTER SUBMISSION OF THE CAUSE TO THE JURY FOR DELIBERATIONS IN THE TRIAL OF A NON-CAPITAL CASE, IS IT REVERSIBLE ERROR PER SE FOR A TRIAL COURT TO AUTHORIZE THE JUR…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw