JOE JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Postconviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
SHIVERS, Judge.
Defendant Jackson filed a motion for post-conviction relief raising two grounds: (1) that the trial court erred in accepting his guilty plea without questioning him regarding his understanding of the consequences of retention of jurisdiction; and (2) that the trial court erred in retaining juris-
diction over his sentence without stating its justification for doing so with particularity, according to section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). The trial court summarily denied the motion after finding it to be legally insufficient to justify relief. We find that appellant might be entitled to relief if he establishes the allegations set forth in his motion. See State v. Green, 421 So. 2d 508 (Fla.1982) and Cahill v. State, 489 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach the portions of the record and files which conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief or to order the State Attorney to file an answer or other pleading pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SMITH and ZEMMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
F.M.W. Props., Inc. v. Peoples First Fin. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 606 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…renced does not 'appear as an attachment to the pleading, which is itself included as Item 2 in the appellant’s appendix, filed in this appeal of a nonfinal order. See FIa.R.App.P. 9.220. . We have noted our earlier decision in DeAtley v. McKinley, 497 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In that case this court reversed the summary judgment against the mortgagors with directions that the trial court allow the mortgagors to amend their answer so as to allege proper affirmative defenses. The opinion discloses that…
-
Mort Sher v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 557 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…mstances presented an issue of material fact for decision, and “the withdrawal of the technical admissions and acceptance of the belated response would serve to facilitate the presentation of the case on its evidentiary merits.” DeAtley v. McKinley, 497 So. 2d 962, 963 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Pelkey v. Commander Motel Corp., 510 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Melody Tours, Inc. v. Granville Market Letter, Inc., 413 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Love v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 362 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)…
-
Robert C. Malt & Co. v. Kelly Tractor Co., 518 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)…proved and accepted at trial, would overcome the presumption of correctness of an account stated. The fact that this defense was not more specifically raised in the answer should not deprive appellants of their day in court. Cf. DeAtley v. McKinley, 497 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Home Health Services of Sarasota v. McQuay-Garrett, Sullivan & Company, 462 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We, therefore, reverse the summary final judgment and remand for further proceedings. We further note, for the benefit o…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Green, 421 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 1982)
- Cahill v. State, 489 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)