WALTER REVEAR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
SANDERLIN, Judge.
In this case, Revear appeals his sentence following revocation of probation. We affirm the revocation and sentence, but grant Revear’s request that the order of revocation be corrected to accurately reflect the trial court’s findings.
At the hearing below, the trial court heard testimony and concluded that Revear was in violation of conditions one and five of his probation. However, the written order of revocation also lists violations of conditions two, five, and nine. This was error. The order of revocation must conform to the findings of the revocation hearing. See Brown v. State, 429 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation and sentence, but order that the written order of revocation be corrected to reflect only conditions one and five as violations.
DANAHY, C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DeVILLE v. State, 529 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…ant also contends that the trial court erred in not entering a written order giving the reasons for revoking probation. On remand, the trial court should enter the proper written order, corresponding with his oral pronouncement. See Revear v. State, 497 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). The conviction is affirmed. The sentence is reversed and remanded for resentencing. CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur.…
-
Dukes v. State, 528 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…ther charges and no evidence was presented on them. The trial court erred in including the other charges in the written order of revocation. The order of revocation must be corrected to accurately reflect the trial court’s findings. Revear v. State, 497 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Reversed and remanded. DANAHY and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.…
-
Dundas v. State, 891 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…ty control solely on condition 8, the revocation order should be corrected to comport with its oral pronouncement. See Turner v. State, 873 So. 2d 480, 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Gordon v. State, 827 So. 2d 346, 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Revear v. State, 497 So. 2d 1337, 1337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Sampson v. State, 375 So. 2d 325, 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions. FULMER and SALCINES, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 429 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)