JOEL ESTREMERA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-12-02
No. 85-2052
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
498 So. 2d 572 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joel Estremera, was found guilty of first-degree murder [count VII]; three counts of aggravated assault [counts I, VIII and IX]; improper exhibition of a weapon [count III]; and false imprisonment [count IV]. Pursuant to these findings of the jury, the trial court entered the judgments of conviction and sentences from which the appellant has taken this appeal.

We have carefully considered the entire record and the points raised in the briefs and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law and have concluded that no reversible error has been_ demonstrated. The jury was supported in its verdict by substantial competent evidence and no error was committed which injuriously affected the substantial rights of the appellant.

Therefore the judgments and sentences appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Estremera v. State, 512 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Estremera v. State, 498 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850; see McCrae v. State, 437 So. 2d 1388 (Fla.1983); Yanks v. State, 273 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 277 So. 2d 288 (Fla.1973).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw