ALAN E. KRUEGER, APPELLANT,
v.
NANCY CAYFORD WEAR, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-12-02
No. 86-1864
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
498 So. 2d 578 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Treating this appeal from an order transferring a case from the circuit court to county court as a petition for writ of certiorari, Norris v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 324 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Thibadeau v. Santini Bros., Inc., 315 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c), we deny the petition for certiorari on the ground that section 34.-01(c)2, Florida Statutes (1985), specifies that the amount in controversy is determined “exclusive of interest....”

Petition denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. Wander, 592 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
    …ansferring the case to the county court, were nonfinal orders not reviewable by appeal. However, the order transferring the case to the county court, based on the grounds set forth in the earlier orders, is reviewable by certiorari. Krueger v. Wear, 498 So. 2d 578 (Fla.3d DCA 1986); Norris v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 324 So. 2d 108 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw