DAVID L. MASINTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MARLIN DRILLING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
DAVID L. MASINTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
MARLIN DRILLING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
938 F.2d 536
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Masinter has filed a petition for rehearing in Masinter v. Tenneco Oil Company, 929 F. 2d 191 (5th Cir.1991) (Masinter II) and a motion to recall and reform the mandate entered in Masinter v. Tenneco Oil Company, 867 F. 2d 892 (5th Cir.1989) (Masinter I). The panel in Ma-sinter I recalled and reformed its mandate and instructed the district court to award Masinter interest on his award of future lost wages from the date of the first judgment.
In Masinter II this Court ruled that Ma-sinter could only recover interest on his award of future lost wages from the date of a second, modified judgment pursuant to the original mandate in Masinter I. Because of the reformation of that mandate we now grant Masinter’s petition for rehearing in Masinter II. We remand to the district court the issue relating to Masinter's interest award on future lost wages for further proceedings consistent with the reformed mandate in Masinter I.
We confirm and reinstate our prior opinion, 929 F. 2d 191, in all respects not inconsistent herewith.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sawyer v. Whitley, 945 F.2d 812 (5th Cir. 1991)
-
MAY v. Collins, 955 F.2d 299 (5th Cir. 1992)
-
MAY v. Collins, 948 F.2d 162 (5th Cir. 1992)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Masinter v. Tenneco OIL Co., 867 F.2d 892 (5th Cir. 1989)
- Masinter v. Tenneco OIL Co., 929 F.2d 191 (5th Cir. 1991)