VICTOR HALL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Zinnerman v. State, 985 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …te, 439 So. 2d 246, 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (en banc) (stating that in a direct appeal, the rules of procedure “clearly permit volun-tariness to be presumed from the fact of a written waiver of jury trial which appears in the record”); Hall v. State, 498 So. 2d 1002, 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (relying on Dumas); Parker v. State, 636 So. 2d 794, 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (following Dumas ). This is consistent with the understanding that “[a] court is not constitutionally required to conduct an on the record colloquy…
• Pensacola Junior Coll. v. Montgomery, 539 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …new trial, Montgomery orally raised the issue of excess coverage that would further waive PJC’s statutory immunity to the extent of coverage. See section 286.28, Fla.Stat. (1981); and also Avallone v. Board of County Commissioners of Citrus County, 498 So. 2d 1002 (Fla.1986).1 A post-trial hearing was then held before the comí without a jury in February 1987 to determine: (1) whether PJC had purchased liability insurance applicable to Montgomery’s claim in excess of the sovereign immunity statutory limit of $…
• Martin v. Dep't OF Agric., 586 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
  …The supreme court held that sovereign immunity did not bar the suit and that Sarasota County could be shown to have breached a duty (of care to warn) to the deceased swimmer. Similarly in Avallone v. Board of County Commissioners of Citrus County, 498 So. 2d 1002 (Fla.1986), the supreme court rejected the argument that the County’s decision to supervise a swimming facility was a planning-level decision. Once the decision to operate a swimming area is made, the court held, the county must operate the facility…

Authorities Cited

• Dumas v. State, 439 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)