JOE PEDRERO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Joe Pedrero appeals his sentences for cocaine delivery and possession, challenging the trial court's sentencing methodology. The court erred by failing to use a sentencing guidelines scoresheet and departing from guidelines without written reasons, prompting reversal and remand for resentencing.
Yes. The trial court erred by failing to prepare and file a mandatory sentencing guidelines scoresheet and by departing from guidelines without valid reasons or written justification. The reason given (parole violation) is not a valid ground for departure, and even if it were, departure requires written findings of clear and convincing reasons.
[1] A trial court must prepare and utilize a sentencing guidelines score-sheet before imposing a sentence.
[2] The absence of a sentencing guidelines score-sheet is harmless error only if all parties are informed of its contents and aware of the presumptive sentence.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(1) requires the preparation of a scoresheet. This requirement is mandatory.”
Establishes that scoresheet preparation is not discretionary but mandatory under criminal procedure rules.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePedrero was convicted by jury of delivery of cocaine under Fla. Stat. § 893.13(1)(a)(1) and possession of cocaine under Fla. Stat. § 893.13(1)(e). At …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumptive Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
SCHOONOVER, Judge.
Appellant, Joe Pedrero, challenges his sentences for delivery and possession of cocaine. We find the trial court erred in sentencing appellant and, accordingly, remand for resentencing.
A jury found appellant guilty of delivery of cocaine in violation of section 893.-13(l)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (1983), and of possession of cocaine in violation of section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes' (1983). At sentencing, the trial court orally announced that since appellant had violated his parole, it was going to depart from the guidelines in sentencing him. The court then, without referring to a sentencing guidelines score-sheet, sentenced appellant to serve ten years in the state prison for the offense of delivery of cocaine and five years for the offense of possession of cocaine. The sentences were to be served concurrently. This appeal timely followed.
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in sentencing him without the benefit of a sentencing guidelines score-sheet and in departing from the guidelines without providing written reasons for doing so.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(1) requires the preparation of a scoresheet. This requirement is mandatory. Stokes v. State, 476 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The record on appeal establishes that no scoresheet was filed in the trial court.
This court has held that if all parties are informed of the contents of a score-sheet and are aware of the presumptive sentence, the absence of a scoresheet is harmless error. See Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review denied, 471 So. 2d 43 (Fla.1985). In this case, however, the only reference to the guidelines sentence was made by appellant's attorney when he stated the guidelines sentence appeared to be reasonable. This is not sufficient to establish that the trial court was aware of appellant’s presumptive sentence. Barr v. State, 474 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The trial court, accordingly, erred in sentencing appellant and in attempting to depart from the guidelines when doing so. Lawrence v. State, 470 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Doby v. State, 461 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Even if a scoresheet had been prepared and filed in the trial court, we would still have to remand for resentencing. The trial court orally gave one reason for departing from the guidelines, i.e., the appellant had violated his parole. This reason is not a valid reason for departure. Lewis v. State, 483 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Additionally, the court did not enter a written statement setting forth clear and convincing reasons for departure. State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1985).
We, accordingly, reverse and remand for resentencing. Upon remand, the court should not sentence appellant without a guidelines scoresheet and if it departs from the presumptive sentence, it must set forth, in writing, clear and convincing reasons for doing so.
Reversed and remanded.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bradley v. State, 509 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…nting departure in State v. Pentaude, 500 So. 2d 526 (Fla.1987), the record does not reflect Bradley’s violation of probation but only the currency of a “parole” violation proceeding; that fact will not, however, support departure. Pedrero v. State, 499 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). The trial court's reliance upon statements contained in a PSI report indicating that Bradley had been sentenced to ten years in state prison runs afoul of Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 1985). The trial court’s findings…
-
Price v. State, 693 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…et of any kind and the Clerk of the Circuit Court has certified that there is none in the appellant’s record. Without a properly prepared score-sheet in the record, we cannot determine if the sentence under review is a legal one. Pedrero v. State, 499 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Barr v. State, 474 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Moreover, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(2) requires the preparation of a scoresheet and that the sentencing judge review it for accuracy. We reject the State’s argum…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1985)
- Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Doby v. State, 461 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Barr v. State, 474 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Stokes v. State, 476 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- Lawrence v. State, 470 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Lewis v. State, 483 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)