MIKE D. LEE, D/B/A MID-SOUTH INVESTMENT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
MIKE D. LEE, D/B/A MID-SOUTH INVESTMENT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
WAL-MART STORES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
951 F.2d 54
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED. The court corrects its opinion to the extent that it erroneously referred to “releases” in the Daingerfield transaction documents, 943 F. 2d 554, 560 (5th Cir.1991); the presence or absence of release language does not, however, affect our analysis of the estoppel issue.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richards v. Michelin Tire Corp., 21 F.3d 1048 (11th Cir. 1994)
-
Romarico S. More v. Intelcom Support Servs., Inc., 960 F.2d 466 (5th Cir. 1992)
Authorities Cited
- LEE v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 943 F.2d 554 (5th Cir. 1991)