JAMES BEAHN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1986-12-30
No. 85-2979
RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
499 So. 2d 74 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1986)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in assessing court costs against an indigent appellant without adequate notice and that the imposition of certain costs violated ex post facto restrictions.


Facts & Procedural History

The trial court assessed court costs against an indigent appellant. The appellant was not given adequate notice that these costs would be imposed.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
HALL, Judge.

HALL, Judge.

James Beahn appeals that portion of the trial court’s order requiring him to pay certain court costs. We agree that the trial court erred in assessing these costs.

The trial court assessed costs against appellant, an indigent, in the amount of $200 pursuant to section 27.-3455, Florida Statutes (1985), $20 pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985), and $2 pursuant to section 943.25(8), Florida Statutes (1985). Since appellant was adjudged insolvent but not given adequate notice that these costs would be imposed upon him, we must remand this cause to the trial court to afford appellant the procedural requirements of Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984).

We also find that the imposition of court costs of $200 pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985) was a violation of constitutional ex post facto restrictions and reverse that portion of appellant’s judgment. Bowman v. State, 495 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We certify the question set out in Bowman to the Florida Supreme Court as a question of great public importance.

RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw