THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
DOUGLAS I. MILAN, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court approves the referee's findings and recommendations, suspending the respondent attorney.
This is a disciplinary proceeding based on the respondent attorney's conditional guilty plea and the referee's report. The referee found the responden…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Proof Of Rehabilitation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar, respondent’s conditional guilty plea, and the uncontested report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) (conduct contrary to honesty, justice or good morals) of the Integration Rule. The referee recommended a two-year suspension retroactive to November 1, 1982.
We approve the referee’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, respondent is suspended for two years, retroactive to November 1,1982, and must provide proof of rehabilitation upon application for reinstatement to the bar. Judgment for costs in the amount of $300 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
MCDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.