UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
GEORGE STEPHEN AGUILAR-CORREA, AKA EL GRANDE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1992-01-09
No. 90-10002
Before BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, District Judge.
953 F.2d 558 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1992) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing must be filed at least seven days before the deadline for the petition.


Facts & Procedural History

The government sought an extension to file a petition for rehearing, but the motion was denied as untimely under local rules. The government argued th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

The government seeks clarification or reconsideration of an order denying its motion for extension of time to file a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. We declined to grant that motion because it was not filed at least seven days before the expiration of the time prescribed for filing the brief, as required by 9th Cir.R. 31-2.3(b). The government argues that we have never said this before, and that our standard instructions do not impose this requirement either. Having reconsidered the question, we reiterate that a request for extension of time to file a petition for rehearing must be filed at least seven days before the petition itself should be filed.

Fed.R.App.P. 40(b) provides that “[t]he petition shall be in a form prescribed by Rule 32(a), and copies shall be served and filed as prescribed by Rule 31(b) for the service and filing of briefs.” Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2, relating to time for service and filing of briefs, in turn, provides that motions for extensions of time be filed at least seven days before the expiration of the time prescribed for filing the brief, and shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating a number of things. This requirement applies as much to a brief petitioning for rehearing as to any other brief.

This makes sense because it allows time for filing the paper — in this case the petition — if the requested extension is denied. Otherwise, if the request is denied, the requesting party has no opportunity to try to accomplish a timely filing.

Given the government’s representation of surprise, however, we shall excuse the failure in this case. Its petition shall be filed within thirty days the order.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw