THE FLORIDA STAR, APPELLANT,
v.
B.J.F., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the publication of a rape victim's name was a private matter and prohibited by law, affirming the judgment.
[1] A notice of appeal filed simultaneously with post-trial motions constitutes an abandonment of those motions, rendering the notice of appeal effective.
[2] A court is divested of jurisdiction when a notice of appeal is filed, unless post-trial motions are pending.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved an appeal from a jury verdict awarding damages for the publication of a rape victim's name. The court considered whether it had juri…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages pursuant to a jury verdict. We affirm.
The threshold question is whether this court has jurisdiction. We find that appellant abandoned the post-trial motions, and we distinguish this case from Leopard v. State, 489 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), and Lloyd v. Harrison, 489 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), wherein the post-trial motions were filed prior to the notice of appeal being filed. In those cases, the sequence of filing rendered the orders on appeal nonfinal until disposition of the post-trial motions; whereas the simultaneous filing, which occurred here, amounts to an abandonment of the post-trial motions.1
Reaching the merits, we find that the information published, the rape victim’s name, was of a private nature and not to be published as a matter of law.2 See Doe v. Sarasota-Bradenton Florida Television Company, Inc., 436 So. 2d 328, 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), particularly the reference to Opinion 075-203 of the Attorney General of Florida (July 14,1975), which suggests that Section 794.03, Florida Statutes, be applied to the prosecution of parties publishing nonpublic information. Accordingly, we affirm.
BOOTH, C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. . Our review of the record fails to reveal that any of the post-trial motions could be deemed "pending” at the time the notice of appeal was filed. Thus, there appears no error in the trial court’s determination that it was divested of jurisdiction by the filing of the notice of appeal.
. Section 794.03, Florida Statutes, is pertinent and states:
No person shall print, publish, or broadcast, or cause or allow to be printed, published, or broadcast, in any instrument of mass communication the name, address, or other identifying fact or information of the victim of any sexual offense within this chapter. An offense under this section shall constitute a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.-084.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Forfeiture OF $104 v. Metro Dade Police Dep't, 578 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…vrolet Blazer, 436 So. 2d at 1088; accord Jackson v. State, 570 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Brumlik v. Catalyst, Inc., 463 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Griffith v. State, 435 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); see also The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 499 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 509 So. 2d 1117 (Fla.1987), reversed on other grounds, 491 U.S. 524, 109 S.Ct. 2603, 105 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989) (post-trial motions are abandoned when filed simultaneously with notice of appeal). We indicate our disag…
-
M.L.B. and J.B. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 559 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
-
A.A. v. E.P., 559 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lloyd v. Baya Harrison, 489 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Leopard v. State, 489 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- "Jane DOE v. Sarasota-Bradenton Fla. Television Co., Inc., 436 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)