CHARLES H. GUILLORY, OWNER, ON BEHALF OF THE STRATOS MODEL 274FS, AND UNDERWRITERS OF LLOYDS OF LONDON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
OUTBOARD MOTOR CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, CONNIE DESHOTELS, ETC. AND POLICE JURY EVANGELINE PARISH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the waterway in question is not navigable.
Charles Guillory sought limitation of liability under the Limitation of Liability Act for an incident on Crooked Creek Reservoir. The reservoir is art…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Limitation Of Liability Act cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Charles Guillory brought this complaint for exoneration from or limitation of liability under the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C.App. §§ 181 et seq. The potential liability arises out of an incident that occurred when Guillory was operating his bass boat on the waters of Crooked Creek Reservoir in Louisiana. The district court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Crooked Creek Reservoir is not a navigable waterway. We agree.
The Crooked Creek Reservoir is located in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, and was created for recreation and flood control by a dam constructed between Crooked Creek and Bayou Nezbique. Crooked Creek is located entirely within Evangeline Parish and the state of Louisiana. Vessels cannot access Bayou Nez-bique because of the dam. Nor can they travel interstate to the waters of Crooked Creek. Even before construction of the dam, Crooked Creek was so shallow in depth and overgrown by brush that it was difficult, if not impossible, for any vessel to travel across its waters.
The Limitation of Liability Act does not confer jurisdiction upon federal courts. That must come from our admiralty jurisdiction under U.S. Const, art. Ill, § 2 and 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1). Suits lacking any relationship to either navigable waters or traditional maritime activity are without admiralty jurisdiction. Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A., Ltd. v. Morts, 921 F. 2d 775, 777 (8th Cir.1990), on remand from, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3265, 111 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990), vacating and remanding 878 F. 2d 1096 (8th Cir.1989), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 272, 116 L.Ed.2d 224 (1991); Lewis Charters, Inc. v. Huckins Yacht Corp., 871 F. 2d 1046, 1050 (11th Cir.1989).
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Complaint of the SEA Vessel, Inc. v. Reyes, 23 F.3d 345 (11th Cir. 1994)
-
Lykes Bros. v. United States Army Corps of Eng'rs, 821 F. Supp. 1457 (M.D. Fla. 1993)…sibly be used in commerce on FEC *1464 is prevented from access to LOK by the impenetrable CBM because of its shallow depth and overgrown vegetation, thus negating the possibility of interstate commerce. Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 956 F.2d 114 (5th Cir.1992). 10. The type of small, shallow-draft canoe and John boat use that occurred on Fisheating Creek does not support a finding of commercial interstate navigability. U.S. v. Oregon, 295 U.S. 1, 23, 55 S.Ct. 610, 619, 79 L.Ed. 12…
-
Guillaume v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 743 F. Supp. 2d 103 (S.D. Fla. 2013)…stern Development court’s reasoning is not consistent with more recent decisions that strictly apply the locality prong of the admiralty jurisdiction test — including more recent decisions by the Fifth Circuit. See Guillory v. Outboard Motors Corp., 956 F.2d 114, 114 (5th Cir.1992) (per curiam). Furthermore, even assuming for the sake of argument that the American Eastern Development court’s reasoning was sound, the case is also distinguishable on its facts. That case involved boats that were taken “out of…
Authorities Cited
- Lewis Charters, Inc. v. Huckins Yacht Corp., 871 F.2d 1046 (11th Cir. 1989)
- In re the Complaint of Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A. Ltd. v. Morts, 921 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1990)
- In re the Complaint of Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A., Ltd. v. Morts, 878 F.2d 1096 (8th Cir. 1989)