ARNOLD BERKENFELD, APPELLANT,
v.
MGB CORPORATION D/B/A GULFSTREAM SEAFOODS, APPELLEE
ARNOLD BERKENFELD, APPELLANT,
MGB CORPORATION D/B/A GULFSTREAM SEAFOODS, APPELLEE
500 So. 2d 349
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause is per curiam affirmed except for the inclusion of costs in the final award.
There is no need for further discussion inasmuch as both parties concede in their appellate briefs that the issue of costs was not before the court on the date of the order now appealed. Accordingly, the award of costs is reversed, this cause remanded for the entry of an amended order and for such further proceedings on the costs issue as the court deems just and proper. In all other respects, the trial judge’s order is affirmed,
LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gillion v. State, 573 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1991)…rial and was not highlighted in closing argument. Petitioner also complains that because Mintus saw people involved in drug dealings and he was later seen in the area, the only inference to be drawn is that he is a drug dealer. In Huffman v. State, 500 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), a case where the defendant was arrested on a Greyhound bus, the district court let stand testimony by a state witness which revealed that the local police had arrested many people using buses to transport drugs north. The court…
-
Robinson v. State, 561 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…417 So. 2d 639, 642 (Fla.1982); Williams v. State, 354 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), a fortiori a reference to the defendant’s presence in a “high [*1265] crime” area is subject to a correction through a curative instruction. See Huffman v. State, 500 So. 2d 349, 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Even if that were not so, we conclude that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986). No reversible error has been shown with respect to the admission into evidenc…
-
Gillion v. State, 547 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…FENDANT WHO IS ARRESTED THERE? As to the colloquy about the defendant selling cocaine, we believe that defense counsel opened the door for the answer given and no error is demonstrated. AFFIRMED. WALDEN, J., concurs. . But see: Huffman v. State, 500 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence