ROBERT ALTON HARRIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
DANIEL VASQUEZ, WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON AT SAN QUENTIN, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the appellant's motion to recall the mandate and his petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Appellant Robert Alton Harris filed a motion to recall the court's mandate, grant a rehearing, and suggest a rehearing en banc after his petition for …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Recall Of Mandate cases and more on FLexlaw
In a motion filed on April 18, 1992, Appellant, Robert Alton Harris, asks this court to recall its mandate issued on March 10, 1992, following the denial by the United States Supreme Court of petition for a writ of certiorari. Appellant also petitions this court to grant a rehearing and suggests a rehearing en banc.
Appellant’s motion for recall of the mandate is denied. Appellant has not shown, as required by Zipfel v. Halliburton Co., 861 F. 2d 565, 567 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1054, 108 S.Ct. 2819, 100 L.Ed.2d 921 (1988), that exceptional circumstances justify a recall of the mandate.
The Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc also is denied as untimely. See Adamson v. Lewis, 955 F. 2d 614 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc); Fed.R.App.P. 40. We previously stated, in our order denying Petitioner’s motion for stay of mandate and petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed on March 6, 1992, that no future petition for rehearing would be entertained. See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b).
NOONAN, Circuit Judge, would grant the motion fpr recall of the mandate, and the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Milian-Rodriguez v. United States, 486 U.S. 1054 (U.S. 1988)
- Granfinanciera v. Nordberg, 486 U.S. 1054 (U.S. 1988)
- Shereen Ramona Zipfel v. Halliburton Co., 861 F.2d 565 (9th Cir. 1988)
- Adamson v. Lewis, 955 F.2d 614 (9th Cir. 1992)