UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,

v.

SANDY F. ALEXANDER, COLLETTE ALEXANDER, KIMBERLY ALEXANDER, HOWARD S. WEISBROD, MARY WEISBROD, HERBERT KITTEL, MICHELLE KITTEL, CHARLES ZITO, DEFENDANTS, PAUL F. CASEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

2d Cir. | 1992-04-22

Nos. 1255, Docket 91-1746

Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND and PRATT, Circuit Judges, and Michael B. MUKASEY, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

962 F.2d 199 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1992) Positive Treatment

Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Leval’s opinion, United States v. Casey, 788 F.Supp. 725 (S.D.N.Y.1991).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Haynes v. W.C. Caye & Co., Inc., 52 F.3d 928 (11th Cir. 1995)
Motel Mikinberg v. Baltic S.S. Co., 988 F.2d 327 (2d Cir. 1993)
United States v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 370 (10th Cir. 1992)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. SANDY F. ALEXANDER, COLLETTE ALEXANDER, KIMBERLY ALEXANDER, HOWARD S. WEISBROD, MARY WEISBROD, HERBERT KITTEL, MICHELLE KITTEL, CHARLES ZITO, DEFENDANTS, PAUL F. CASEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,

v.

SANDY F. ALEXANDER, COLLETTE ALEXANDER, KIMBERLY ALEXANDER, HOWARD S. WEISBROD, MARY WEISBROD, HERBERT KITTEL, MICHELLE KITTEL, CHARLES ZITO, DEFENDANTS, PAUL F. CASEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT