JERRY C. ROZAR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the tender years of the victim and the state attorney's charging decisions are invalid reasons for departing from sentencing guidelines.
The defendant was convicted of lewd and lascivious assault on a child under sixteen. The trial judge departed from the sentencing guidelines based on …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Guidelines Departure cases and more on FLexlaw
UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.
Jerry Rozar appeals a judgment and sentence for three counts of lewd and lascivious assault on a child under the age of sixteen. Rozar’s recommended guideline sentence was two and one-half to three and one-half years imprisonment. The trial judge departed from the guidelines, stating as his reasons the tender years of the victim and the fact that the state attorney did not charge the highest crime possible.
Rozar was convicted of three counts of violating section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1985), which prohibits a lewd or lascivious assault on any child under the age of sixteen years. Because age is an inherent component of the crime, the tender years of the victims cannot be used to justify departure. See Dowling v. State, 495 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
The second reason for departure, the trial court’s belief that the state failed to charge the highest crime possible, is likewise invalid. This ground violates Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll) because it punishes the defendant for offenses for which he has not been convicted. See Bram v. State, 496 So. 2d 882 (Fla.2d DCA 1986); Baxter v. State, 488 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
Rozar’s conviction is affirmed. However, we conclude that these are invalid reasons under the guidelines and that we must reverse and remand for resentencing.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harris v. State, 566 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…en for departure have either been held insufficient or are not supported by the record. The age of the victim is an inherent component of the crime of lewd assault on a child. See Graham v. State, 557 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Rozar v. State, 500 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Dowling v. State, 495 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Abuse of a position of trust does not support a departure sentence imposed for a lewd assault upon a child because such abuse is so commonly performed by persons who take ad…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Wong v. NEW Prospect Enters., Inc., 488 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
- Dowling v. State, 495 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
- Bram v. State, 496 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)