DEBBIE PURCELLA, DOING BUSINESS AS INTERMOUNTAIN COMPANIES; MONTY PURCELLA, DOING BUSINESS AS INTERMOUNTAIN COMPANIES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE

10th Cir. | 1992-07-10
Nos. 92-1071, 92-1078 and 92-1107
Before LOGAN, MOORE, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
968 F.2d 10 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1992)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 42(b), Fed.R.App.P., and the stipulation submitted by the parties, these appeals have been settled and are hereby dismissed as moot. The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its judgment of January 14, 1992, reported at 1992 WL 8723, 1992 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 426, and to dismiss the complaint. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106-107, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); Beattie v. United States, 949 F. 2d 1092, 1095 (10th Cir.1991); Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 826 F. 2d 948 (10th Cir.1987).

Each party shall bear its own costs and the mandate shall issue forthwith.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw