THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,

v.

LARRY R. BERGMAN, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Gulf Coast Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Johnson, 727 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1999)
  …New Smyrna Beach v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 469 So. 2d 731 (Fla.1985), or territorial disputes regarding service to particular customers where no territorial agreement exists. See, e.g., Clark, 674 So. 2d at 120; Lee County Elec. Coop. v. Marks, 501 So. 2d 585 (Fla.1987); Gulf Coast Elec. Coop. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 462 So. 2d 1092 (Fla.1985). Here, there is no present dispute as to service to any current or future identifiable customer, no pre-existing territorial agreement, and no agreement on t…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Bell Care Nurses Registry, Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 25 So. 3d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …ovided. The legislature’s enactment of the statute was undoubtedly based, in part, upon just such consideration. In addition, this policy provision promotes the type of economic waste the law in general abhors. See Lee County Elec. Co-op. v. Marks, 501 So. 2d 585, 587 (Fla.1987) (condemning economic waste and inefficiency resulting from utilities “racing to serve”); Fla. Dep’t of Citrus v. Griffin, 239 So. 2d 577, 578 (Fla.1970) (observing the legislative desire to avoid economic waste in the citrus industry…
• W. Fla. Elec. Coop. Ass'n, Inc. v. Jacobs, 887 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 2004)
  …rk, 674 So. 2d 120, 123 (Fla.1996). Although we also have warned that an “individual has no organic, economic or political right to service by a particular utility merely because he deems it advantageous to himself,” Lee County Elec. Coop. v. Marks, 501 So. 2d 585, 587 (Fla.1987), the commission’s order in no [*1205] way violates this principle. The commission followed section 366.04, Florida Statutes, and rule 25-6.0441(2) by assessing a number of factors. Determining in this case that factors (a) through (c…

  ← 1 / 2 →