MCCASKILL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BANK OF THOMASVILLE, GEORGIA, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
MCCASKILL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
BANK OF THOMASVILLE, GEORGIA, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
104 Fla. 300
Florida Supreme Court (1932)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 139 So. 896
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record and the decree herein and the brief and argument of counsel *301for the appellant and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree. It is therefore considered, ordered, and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Polyglycoat Corp. v. Hirsch Distribs., Inc., 442 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)…to acquaint the Court with the material facts, the points of law involved, and the legal arguments supporting the positions of the respective parties. See Re: Estate of Barret, 137 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962) and Clonts v. Spurway, 104 Fla. 340, 139 So. 896 (1932). When points, positions, facts and supporting authorities are omitted from the brief, a court is entitled to believe that such are waived, abandoned, or deemed by counsel to be unworthy. Again, it is not the function of the Court to rebrief a…
-
Moore v. Boyd, 62 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1952)…nce plaintiff is permitted in proper case to proceed to judgment upon so much of the case as is not controverted by taking judgment nil dicit as to so much of the declaration as is not covered by the plea. Clonts v. Spurway, etc., 104 Fla. 340, 341, 139 So. 896. We are not assuming that substantial justice was not done by the entry of final judgment. But we have the definite conviction that the proceedings are replete with such disregard for the observance of the Common Law Rules that there should be a fr…
-
DOE v. Baptist Primary Care, Inc., 177 So. 3d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…as to acquaint the Court with the material facts, the points of law involved, and the legal arguments supporting the positions of the respective parties. See Estate of Barret, 137 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962) and Clorits v. Spur-way, 104 Fla. 340, 139 So. 896 (1932). When points, positions, facts and supporting authorities are omitted from the brief, a court is entitled to believe that such are waived, abandoned, or deemed by counsel to be unworthy. Again, it is not the function of the Court to rebrief a…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence