UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JEROME A. SUSSKIND (91-1003), JAMES J. RUMLER (91-1004), SCOTT NICKERSON (91-1005), DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

6th Cir. | 1992-09-04
Nos. 91-1003 to 91-1005
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SURHREINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.
975 F.2d 1206 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1992)
Opinion of the Court

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule the cases for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw