FREDERICK J. FREY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
FREDERICK J. FREY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
976 F.2d 242
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We originally held that royalties were due on lessee’s take-or-pay receipts under this lease. Frey v. Amoco Production Co., 943 F. 2d 578 (5th Cir.1991). We then granted rehearing to certify to the Supreme Court of Louisiana that take-or-pay issue. 951 F. 2d 67. The Louisiana court has now confirmed our original holding with a unanimous and thorough statement of the controlling state law. Frey v. Amoco Production Co., 603 So. 2d 166 (La.1992). Accordingly, we reinstate Part IIA. of our opinion published at 943 F. 2d 578, remand the case for further proceedings consistent with the court opinions, and deny further rehearing.
REVERSED AND REMANDED. REHEARING DENIED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Helene Donna Alpert, 28 F.3d 1104 (11th Cir. 1994)
-
United States v. Richard Allen Banks, 347 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2003)
Authorities Cited
- Frey v. Amoco Prod. Co., 943 F.2d 578 (5th Cir. 1991)
- Frey v. Amoco Prod. Co., 951 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1992)