ANNETTE WHITAKER, APPELLANT,
v.
PIZZA HUT AND STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying Annette Whitaker unemployment benefits because of alleged misconduct as defined in section 443.036(24), Florida Statutes (1985). Gold-stein v. Ury Kalai M.D., P.A., 480 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Our review of the record satisfies us that Whitaker’s action of failing to follow the proper procedure for testing pizza dough was poor judgment not an intentional disregard of her employer’s interests as required by section 443.036(24).
This matter is reversed and remanded for reinstatement of Whitaker’s unemployment benefits.
LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Webb v. Rice, 693 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Calvo v. Florida Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 672 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Kelley v. Pueblo Wholesale Co., 627 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Nelson v. Burdines, Inc., 611 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Whitaker v. Pizza Hut, 502 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Woskoff v. Desta Enter., Inc., 187 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Bulkan, 648 So. 2d at 846. The record, however, does not support the referee’s conclusion that claimant did not use the hole puncher in violation of her employer…
-
Signal Applied Techs., Inc. v. Finley, 519 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…s that the employee did not repeat such conduct after he was reprimanded but at most it reflects poor judgment on the employee’s part which does not establish misconduct as per section 443.036(24), Florida Statutes (1985). See Whitaker v. Pizza Hut, 502 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (employee’s failure to follow proper procedure for testing pizza dough was poor judgment, not intentional disregard of employer’s interests). The Commission is entitled to draw legal conclusions from the evidence, section 120.-57…
-
Carlandia Corp. v. Rogers & Ford Constr. Corp., 605 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…ers have no standing to sue in their individual capacity. We agree that individual condominium unit owners are akin to shareholders in a condominium association, see Condominiums on the Intracoastal Ass’n., Inc. v. Barnett Bank of Palm Beach County, 502 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), but we disagree that they have no standing to sue under the circumstances sub judice. Under section 718.103(10), Florida Statutes (1991), the word “condominium” is defined: “Condominium” means that form of ownership of real pro…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Etta M. Goldstein v. URY Kalai, M.D., P.A., 480 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)