JOYCE WILLIS AND PAMELA TUBBS, APPELLANTS,
v.
MURIEL DICIECO, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before the court on an appeal from a final judgment finding that some wild peafowl, either temporarily or permanently residing on appellants’ land, constitute a nuisance. This finding is supported by ample competent evidence and should be, and is, affirmed.
The only other issue before the court is the method of capture and place of relocation of these peafowl. The final judgment under review does not make clear how this is to be accomplished. We remand for an evidentiary hearing for the trial judge to make this determination so as to accomplish the same with the greatest safety to both the peafowl and the appellant landowners.
ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KLEIN, HERBERT M., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Colon v. State, 586 So. 2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…y apprised his client that the charges carried a mandatory life sentence. However, Colon also alleges that counsel said he would “only have to do two years on this sentence.” If true, this could entitle Colon to relief. See, e.g., McLendon v. State, 502 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (counsel promised more lenient sentence than that actually imposed); Ray v. State, 480 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (counsel misled defendant as to effect of plea on eligibility for gain time). The record before us does not concl…
-
Prezell Wilson v. State, 593 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…lleges he did not know that he had been sentenced as a habitual felony offender until he was in prison. If this allegation is true, then Mr. Wilson may be entitled to relief. See Wilson v. State, 559 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); McLendon v. State, 502 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The trial judge, however, failed to attach to his order any portion of the files or record to refute Mr. Wilson’s allegation. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Mr. Wilson’s motion and remand the case to the trial court.…
-
Clifford v. State, 513 So. 2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…serving no more than ten years. If this allegation is true, and Clifford was not otherwise apprised of the mandatory minimum sentence prior to the acceptance of his plea, Clifford might be entitled to withdraw the plea. See, e.g., McLendon v. State, 502 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Perez v. State, 449 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Although a review of the plea colloquy might very well have resolved this motion, the circuit court did not attach to its order any evidence from the record refuting Clifford’s…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence