FAR OUT MUSIC, INC., FAR OUT MANAGEMENT, LTD. AND STEVEN GOLD, APPELLANTS,
v.
LEROY LONNIE JORDAN, SYLVESTER ALLEN AND HOWARD SCOTT, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Far Out Music, Inc., Far Out Management, Ltd., and Steven Gold appealed from a default judgment awarding nominal and punitive damages for fraud and breach of contract. The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed, finding no error in the entry of default, the sufficiency of the complaint, or the award of damages based on defendants' discovery violations.
The court affirmed the default judgment in all respects, finding no error in the entry of default, the sufficiency of the complaint to state causes of action for fraud and breach of contract, or the award of nominal and punitive damages based on the admitted allegations and defendants' adamant refusal to obey discovery orders.
[1] A default may be entered against a defendant for violations of discovery orders.
[2] A defendant is entitled to adequate notice of a hearing on a motion for default.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the trial court committed no error in awarding nominal and punitive damages below based on (a) the admitted allegations of the complaint establishing fraud, and (b) the adamant refusal of the defendants to obey the trial court's discovery orders, which, in effect, prevented the plaintiffs from establishing a case for compensatory damages.”
Establishes the court's rationale for upholding the damages award despite lack of proven compensatory damages.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiffs Leroy Lonnie Jordan, Sylvester Allen, and Howard Scott sued defendants for fraud in inducing them to enter into personal management, artist…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Entry Of Default cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the defendants Far Out Music, Inc., Far Out Management, Ltd., and Steven Gold from a final judgment entered upon a default after a final hearing on damages. The plaintiffs Leroy Lonnie Jordan, Sylvester Allen, and Howard Scott brought suit below against the defendants for: (1) fraud in inducing the plaintiffs to enter into certain personal management, artist recording, co-publishing, and songwriter contracts, and (2) breach of each of these contracts. Defaults were entered against the defendants for violations of certain discovery orders; the final judgment, in turn, assesses nom inal and punitive damages against each of the defendants.
We find no merit in any of the points raised on appeal by the defendants.
First, we find no error in the entry of the default in this case as (a) the defendants were adequately noticed as to the hearing below on the plaintiffs’ motion for a default, see Lumpkins v. Amendola, 466 So. 2d 1214, 1215-16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); In re Brugh’s Estate, 306 So. 2d 599, 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Reizen v. Florida Nat'l Bank at Gainesville, 237 So. 2d 30, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(b); 1.080(b); see also Caughey v. Belter, 322 So. 2d 83, 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) (where default is properly entered, notice of damages trial to attorney for defendant more than satisfies procedural requirements), cert. denied, 333 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1976), and, (b) defendant’s counsel was properly allowed to withdraw below. See Fisher v. State, 248 So. 2d 479, 486 (Fla. 1971); Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.060(i).
Second, the complaint filed below properly stated a cause of action for fraud and breach of contract. See Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. Rosen, 361 So. 2d 804, 806-07 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Helms v. General Film Dev. Corp., 346 So. 2d 1064, 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Cerniglia v. Davison Chem. Co., 145 So. 2d 254, 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).
Third, the trial court committed no error in awarding nominal and punitive damages below based on (a) the admitted allegations of the complaint establishing fraud, and (b) the adamant refusal of the defendants to obey the trial court’s discovery orders, which, in effect, prevented the plaintiffs from establishing a case for compensatory damages. See Lassitter v. International Union of Operating Engineers, 349 So. 2d 622, 625-26 (Fla.1976); Royal Netherlands S.S. v. Quinto De Garcia, 489 So. 2d 128, 130 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet. for review denied, 496 So. 2d 143 (Fla.1986); Erie Winds, N.V. v. Crab Pot Oceanside, Inc., 449 So. 2d 426, 427 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. Woody’s Elec. Serv., 407 So. 2d 947, 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
The final judgment under review, therefore, is, in all respects,
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scott G. Kranz and IMG v. Levan, 602 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…7 (Fla.1988); HZJ, Inc. v. Wysocki, 511 So. 2d 1088 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); First Overseas Inv. Corp. v. Dantas, 509 So. 2d 987 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); McMillian v. State, Dep’t of Corrections, 506 So. 2d 1171 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Far Out Music, Inc. v. Jordan, 502 So. 2d 523 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Freeman v. Humana, Inc., 501 So. 2d 639 (Fla.3d DCA 1986), rev. denied, 511 So. 2d 298 (Fla.1987); Cedars Assoc. v. E.R. Brownell & Assoc., Inc., 466 So. 2d 1130 (Fla.3d DCA 1985); Morales v. Perez, 445 So. 2d 393 (Fla.3d DCA 1984…
-
940 Ocean Drive, LLC v. Sobe USA, LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
-
940 Ocean Drive, LLC v. Sobe USA, LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited (14 total)
- Lassitter v. Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs, 349 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 1976)
- Fisher v. State, 248 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 1971)
- In re Est. of Allen Lee Brugh v. Freas, 306 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Cerniglia v. Davison Chem. Co., 145 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
- Reizen v. Fla. Nat'l Bank AT Gainesville, 237 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)
- Am. Fid. Fire Ins. Co. v. Woody's Elec. Serv., Inc., 407 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Helms v. Gen. Film Dev. Corp., 346 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Zuckerman-Vernon Corp. v. Rosen, 361 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
- In the Interest of R. A. P., 361 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
- Royal Netherlands S.S. Co. v. Elida Quinto de Garcia, 489 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)