JAMES P. CORCORAN, AS SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND DOMICILIARY RECEIVER OF COSMOPOLITAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL., THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; JAMES P. CORCORAN, AS SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND DOMICILIARY RECEIVER OF CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL., THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES P. CORCORAN, AS SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND DOMICILIARY RECEIVER OF COSMOPOLITAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL., THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE; JAMES P. CORCORAN, AS SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND DOMICILIARY RECEIVER OF CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL., THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
502 So. 2d 966
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1987)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
BARFIELD, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals we affirm the decisions of the trial court, authorizing payment of claims handling expenses of Florida Insurance Guaranty Association as “necessary expenses of the proceeding” pursuant to section 631.152, Florida Statutes (1977 and 1979).
AFFIRMED.
SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
Moore v. Taylor Concrete & Supply Co., Inc., 553 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…that a lawyer’s expression of his personal opinion as to the credibility of a witness, or of his personal knowledge of facts in the case, is fundamentally improper. Stokes v. Wet ’N Wild, Inc., 523 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Brumage v. Plummer, 502 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 513 So. 2d 1062 (Fla.1987); S.H. Investment & Dev. Corp. v. Kincaid, 495 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); review denied, 504 So. 2d 767 (Fla.1987); Gregory v. Seaboard System R.R., Inc., 484 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 2d DCA), revi…
-
Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Morse, 653 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…ed to comments did not rise to the level of fundamental error. We disagree. A contemporaneous objection to improper comments during closing argument is necessary to preserve error, unless the error can be said to be fundamental. Brumage v. Plummer, 502 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla. 3d DCA) (citations omitted), rev. denied, 513 So. 2d 1062 (Fla.1987). Fundamental error occurs if the argument “was so prejudicial as to be incapable of cure by rebuke or retraction,” Borden, Inc. v. Young, 479 So. 2d 850, 851 (Fla. 3d DC…
-
J.T.A. Factors, Inc. v. Philcon Servs., Inc., 820 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…1322 (Fla.1981) (appellate court will not consider issues not presented to the trial judge on appeal from final judgment on the merits). Moreover, we do not find these claimed errors to rise to the level of fundamental error. See Brumage v. Plummer, 502 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Thus, because these claimed errors were not preserved before the trial .court, they are deemed waived. [*371] As to the remaining challenges, J.T.A. initially asserts that the verdict in favor of Philcon on each count was not sup…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence