FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND, APPELLANT,
v.
ELAINE M. COXON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ADAM CHRISTOPHER COXON, AND ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL, INC., APPELLEES; ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL, INC., APPELLANT, V. ELAINE M. COXON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ADAM CHRISTOPHER COXON, DECEASED, AND FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1987-02-27
Nos. 86-814, 86-815
DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.
502 So. 2d 1369 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Florida Patient's Compensation Fund (FPCF) is not liable for attorney's fees awarded under section 768.56, Florida Statutes, and a healthcare provider is liable for such fees after paying their entry-level limits.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellants FPCF and St. Joseph's Hospital appealed a trial court judgment requiring them to pay pro rata attorney's fees. FPCF argued it was not liabl…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, appellants, Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund (“FPCF”) and St. Joseph’s Hospital, Inc. (“St. Joseph’s”), both appeal the trial court’s single final judgment requiring each appellant to pay a pro rata share of the attorney’s fees awarded to appellee pursuant to section 768.56, Florida Statutes (1981). FPCF argues that the legislative scheme encompassed within chapter 768 does not contemplate FPCF being liable for attorney’s fees as a part of a “claim” which FPCF may be obligated to pay. St. Joseph’s argues that once they have paid their entry level limits (in this case $100,-000) as required by chapter 768, their obligation is satisfied and they are not liable for additional payments in the form of attorney’s fees.

We addressed this issue in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Maurer, 493 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). In that case, we held that FPCF was not liable for attorney’s fees imposed pursuant to section 768.56. (Repealed by ch. 85-175, § 43, Laws of Florida.) In addition, we held that the health care provider was liable for such fees.

Following Maurer, we reverse the holding of the trial court which imposed a pro rata liability for attorney’s fees on FPCF, vacate the final judgment and remand for entry of a final judgment consistent herewith. By our holding herein, we are again in conflict with Bouchoc v. Peterson, 490 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Green v. State, 545 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
    …sed on the fact that the crimes were committed just two days after the appellant was released from jail and placed on community control. The timing was properly considered and constitutes a clear and convincing reason for departure. Franks v. State, 502 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The second reason given for departure was that the appellant endangered many persons by discharging a shotgun in a public housing project and forcing police to return fire to defend themselves. Appellant’s actions demonstrated a…
  • Jacobs v. State, 533 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
    …explained in Tillman v. State, 525 So. 2d 862 (Fla.1988) (offense committed four months after release) that this reason represents an aspect of prior criminal record which is not already factored into the guidelines scoresheet. See Franks v. State, 502 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (offense committed two months after community control imposed following probation violation); Bass v. State, 496 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (same offense committed six weeks after release from prison). We think the third reaso…
  • Holmes v. State, 536 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
    …[*381] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Jones, 530 So. 2d 53 (Fla.1988); Franks v. State, 502 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw