KENNETH E. HALL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH E. HALL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
503 So. 2d 335
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1986)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 24 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Hall appeals the summary denial of a “motion to expunge.” An examination of the motion reveals that it fails to meet the requirements of section 943.058(2) Florida Statutes (1985) or Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.692 and 3.989, and so is insufficient on its face. Accordingly, the order of the trial court is affirmed.
RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Glendening v. State, 536 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1988)…EHRLICH, Chief Justice. We have for review Glendening v. State, 503 So. 2d 335 (Fla.2d DCA 1987), in which the district court expressly declared valid section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes (1985). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. On July 26, 1985, Glendening was charged by information with sexual battery up…
-
Jaggers v. State, 536 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…dren testified or were unavailable as witnesses. § 90.803(23)(a)2, Fla.Stat. (1985). There was no finding as to unavailability. The testimony of those two children at trial was by video taped deposition. While this court held in Glendening v. State, 503 So. 2d 335 (Fla.2d DCA 1987), affirmed, 536 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1988) (Glendening I and Glendening II) that, under the circumstances there, such video tape testimony of a child witness was equivalent to personal testimony for the purposes of 90.803(23)(a)2, we hav…
-
Griffin v. State, 526 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)….Ct. at 2663; and Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 65-66, 100 S.Ct. 2531, 2538-39, 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980). Therefore, we are particularly troubled by the quality of the evidence offered in support of the conviction in this case. In Glendening v. State, 503 So. 2d 335, 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), the Second District held that “for purposes of section 90.-803(23)(a)2.a. the introduction of [the child’s] video tape was equivalent to her having personally testified.” Thus, in Glendening the unavailability criterion for…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence