CHERYL SMITH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TRINIDAD CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1993-05-10
No. 91-16826
Before GOODWIN, HUG and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
992 F.2d 996 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1993)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A wife may no longer sue a shipowner for loss of consortium for injuries sustained by her husband under the Jones Act or general admiralty law.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sued the shipowner for loss of consortium after her husband was injured on the defendant's vessel. The trial court granted summary judgment …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Cheryl Smith appeals a summary judgment which denied. her claim for loss of consortium in her action against the shipowner on whose vessel her husband sustained an injury. We affirm.

The Supreme Court in Miles v. Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 111 S.Ct. 317, 112 L.Ed.2d 275 (1990) precluded actions for loss of society under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, and general admiralty law. We agree with the district court that the Supreme Court’s holding in Miles has changed the law, and that wives of injured mariners may no longer sue the ship for damages for their nonpecuniary losses, if any, caused by the injuries to the spouse.

The Fifth Circuit recently faced this same issue in Murray v. Anthony J. Bertucci Constr. Co., Inc., 958 F. 2d 127 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 190, 121 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992), and held that Miles had effectively overruled earlier Fifth Circuit cases allowing wives of injured mariners to recover for loss of society and loss of consortium in their own actions filed under the Jones Act or under general admiralty law. Id. at 129-132. We agree with the Fifth Circuit’s reading of Miles and affirm the summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw