RALPH MONROE HAIR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1987-03-04
No. 86-3252
DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.
503 So. 2d 449 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*450] PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, appellant contends we should grant relief because the trial court, based solely on a finding that appellant violated his probation, bumped his recommended guidelines sentence up more than one cell. His failure to seek appellate review of such an error precluded the trial court from consideration of the issue. Affirmed. Rowe v. State, 496 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lomont v. State, 506 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
    …n a 3.850 motion. Lanier v. State, 478 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). However, Lomont does not state whether counsel was apprised of the alleged scoresheet inaccuracy. For these reasons, the order of the trial court is affirmed. See Hair v. State, 503 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) and Rowe v. State, 496 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). SCHEB and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.…
  • McPHERSON v. State, 692 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
    …MICKLE, Judge. This is an appeal of an order denying the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The motion alleged three grounds for relief. We conclude that the second ground for relief is legally insufficient pursuant to Hair v. State, 503 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (defendant’s failure to seek appellate review of alleged error in departure from guidelines sentence precluded trial court from considering issue upon motion for post-conviction relief), and that the third ground failed to allege…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw