THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL ANTHONY HEZEKIAH, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-12-02
No. 85-2885
Before HENDRY and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
503 So. 2d 907 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on the authority of Zabrani v. Cowart, 502 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). We certify the following question to be of great public importance:

Whether Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(i)(4) is applicable to a criminal case wherein the defendant is taken into custody prior to January 1, 1985, 12:01 A.M., the effective date of the above-stated rule.

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hezekiah v. State, 506 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1987)
    …tion of great public importance: Whether Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(i)(4) is applicable to a criminal case wherein the defendant is taken into custody prior to January 1,1985, 12:01 A.M., the effective date of the above-stated rule. State v. Hezekiah, 503 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). We answered the question posed here affirmatively in Bloom v. McKnight, 502 So. 2d 422 (Fla.1987). We approve the decision below. It is so ordered. MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., c…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw