BURTON DANOFF, APPELLANT,
v.
LINDA A. DANOFF, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
We find that the trial court erred in holding that appellant was responsible for the entire balance of the medical bill and the tuition in question, as these obligations were not incorporated into the final judgment. See Aylward v. Aylward, 420 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). See also Agudo v. Agudo, 411 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). However, we find that the terms of the final judgment encompass the medical bill even though it accrued prior to the final judgment, hold that appellant is responsible for that portion of the medical bill covered by the insurance and medical payment provisions of the final judgment, and affirm to that extent. We also affirm the portion of the trial court’s order regarding visitation and find no error in the trial court’s failure to award appellant attorney’s fees.
LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brooks v. State, 787 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 2001)…rdinarily ends when the crime has been committed. See, e.g., Calvert v. State, 730 So. 2d 316, 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Burnside v. State, 656 So. 2d 241, 245 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Usher v. State, 642 So. 2d 29, 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Moore v. State, 503 So. 2d 923, 924 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Wells v. State, 492 So. 2d 712, 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The State has demonstrated no basis in the record for a contrary holding here. In Wells, the First District specifically held that “statements made which tend to shi…
-
State v. Edwards, 536 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…ict found that it was error for the trial court to admit the hearsay statements of Knox implicating the defendant Nichols, and the convictions of possession and sale of cocaine were reversed. Finally, the Fifth District’s holding in Moore v. State, 503 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), is not at all inconsistent with our opinion in the instant case. Consistent with Moore, we have held that the hearsay statements of Edwards made prior to the November 5 telephone call, which statements implicated Hernandez, were…
-
Verni v. State, 536 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…. State v. Wilson, 466 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Verni argues that there was no proof, independent or otherwise, to indicate that he was a party to the conspiracy at the time of the recorded conversation. He cites as analogous Moore v. State, 503 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), in which the court held inadmissible a tape-recorded conversation such as the one between the C.I. and Wilkins. In Moore, there was no proof that the defendant was a party to the conspiracy at the time of the conversation. Cont…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nury Agudo v. Marcelo Agudo, 411 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- State v. Scotti, 420 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)