JONATHAN HUEY LAWRENCE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Proportionality Review cases and more on FLexlaw
571998CF000270XXAXMX
JONATHAN HUEY LAWRENCE vs. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellant(s) Appellee(s)
Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied. CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, and COURIEL, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion. GROSSHANS, J., did not participate. LABARGA, J., concurring.
I agree that Lawrence has not established a basis for rehearing, and consequently, I have voted to deny rehearing. However, I firmly adhere to my dissent in Lawrence v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S277 (Fla. Oct. 29, 2020), and my belief that proportionality review is an essential part of this Court’s review of death penalty cases on direct appeal.
A True Copy Test: CASE NO.: SC18-2061 Page Two so Served: CHARMAINE M. MILLSAPS BARBARA J. BUSHARIS HON. JOHN L. MILLER, CHIEF JUDGE JOHN A. MOLCHAN HON. DONALD C. SPENCER, CLERK HON. DAVID HAROLD RIMMER
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Craft v. State, 312 So. 3d 45 (Fla. 2020)
-
Colley v. State (Fla. 2020)
-
Craft v. State (Fla. 2021)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Yacob v. State, 136 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 2014)