CHARLES W. GILL, APPELLANT,
v.
SHELLY ANN GILL, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Gain Time cases and more on FLexlaw
LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.
A former husband appeals from various post judgment rulings, including an order requiring the sequestration of his assets to ensure payment of alimony, child support and medical insurance for the parties’ child.
We find no abuse of discretion and affirm except that, with respect to the amount of funds sequestered for the foregoing purposes, it appears that the amount sequestered may be more than necessary to provide for those payments during the maximum period of his incarceration even excluding gain time. See Garland v. Garland, 118 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
We therefore remand for a determination of the amount needed to be sequestered for the foregoing purposes and for a release from sequestration of any amount not so needed.
SANDERLIN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F. (Ret.) J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Held v. Held, 617 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…in determining whether an individual has the ability to pay child support. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1985); § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1991);3 § 61.13(l)(c), Fla.Stat. (1991).4 As a result, we find no abuse of discretion. See also Gill v. Gill, 504 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (a trial court may order sequestration of an incarcerated party’s assets for purposes of securing payment of alimony, child support, or medical insurance for the parties’ child). Finally, the former husband argues that the trial…
-
Rainford Cole and Linda Turner v. Cole, 723 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…s -share of the marital assets in a trust fund for future child support, given the former husband’s current incarceration and precarious immigration status in this country. See § 61.14(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (1995); Held, 617 So. 2d at 360; Gill v. Gill, 504 So. 2d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). However, given the uncertainty concerning whether the former husband will be allowed to remain in this country to support any of his children, we do find merit to the additional argument that the trial court abused its discre…
-
Stowers v. State, 534 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 1988)…KOGAN, Justice. We have for review Stowers v. State, 504 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), in which the district court certified the same question framed in VanTassell v. State, 498 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986): DOES A TRIAL COURT’S STATEMENT, MADE AT THE TIME OF DEPARTURE FROM THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, THAT IT WO…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Garland v. Garland, 118 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)