THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
DAVID N. REID, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court disbarred attorney David N. Reid for professional misconduct involving wrongful misappropriation of funds from an estate, for which he had previously been suspended from practice in Michigan. The court adopted the referee's recommended discipline after Reid failed to respond to the Bar's complaint or petition the referee's findings.
Disbarment is appropriate discipline. The court adopted the referee's recommendation of disbarment, finding it appropriate under the circumstances and effective immediately.
[1] A referee's findings of fact in a disciplinary proceeding are deemed conclusive when the respondent fails to file a petition for review.
[2] A lawyer's failure to respond to a Bar complaint and requests for admissions may result in those matters being deemed admitted.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Respondent has not filed a petition for review of the referee's report. Therefore the referee's findings of fact are deemed conclusive and the recommended disciplinary measure is ordinarily to be accepted.”
Establishes that failure to petition for review results in conclusiveness of findings and presumptive acceptance of the referee's recommended discipline.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Florida Bar filed a disciplinary complaint against Reid alleging he had been suspended from practice in Michigan due to professional misconduct in…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conduct Involving Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit, Or Misrepresentation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court on the complaint of The Florida Bar. A referee was appointed who found professional misconduct and recommended disbarment. Our jurisdiction is based upon article V, section 15, Florida Constitution. The proceeding was brought pursuant to former article XI of The Integration Rule of the Florida Bar.1
The Bar’s complaint alleged that respondent had been suspended from the practice of law in Michigan due to professional misconduct involving the wrongful misappropriation of funds from an estate. The respondent did not respond to the complaint nor to the Bar’s request for admissions of fact.2 Based on matters thus deemed admitted and documents presented by the Bar, the referee found respondent guilty of violating several provisions of the Integration Rule3 and several Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility.4 The referee recommended disbarment.
Respondent has not filed a petition for review of the referee’s report. Therefore the referee’s findings of fact are deemed conclusive and the recommended disciplinary measure is ordinarily to be accepted. Fla.Bar Integ.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.09(3)(f). We find the recommended discipline to be appropriate under the circumstances and therefore adopt it.
David N. Reid is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Florida, effective immediately. Execution is directed to issue for the costs of these proceedings against the respondent in the amount of $330.00, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. . Because this case proceeded through the filing of the referee’s report under article XI of The Integration Rule, references herein are to disciplinary proceedings under that rule and to violations of that rule and the former Code of Professional Responsibility. The Integration Rule and the Code of Professional Responsibility have now been superseded by the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, which took effect on January 1, 1987. The Florida Bar Re Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, 494 So. 2d 977 (Fla.1986).
. Mailing by registered or certified mail to a lawyer’s mailing address as shown by the official records of The Florida Bar is sufficient service of process. Fla.Bar Integr.R., art. XI, Rule 11.01(2).
. Fla.Bar Integr.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) (an act contrary to honesty, justice or good morals is a cause for discipline); id., art. XI, Rule 11.02(4) (money entrusted to a lawyer must be applied only as intended by the client); id., art. XI, Rule 11.02(6) (a lawyer must file notice of suspension from the practice of law in another state).
. Fla.Bar Code Prof.Resp., D.R. 1-102(A)(1) (violation of a disciplinary rule); id., D.R. 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); id., D.R. 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law); id., D.R. 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter); id., D.R. 9-102(B)(4) (failure to promptly deliver property to which client is entitled).