JOE HARRY GALIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOE HARRY GALIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
504 So. 2d 436
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Joe Galis appeals from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion, which is Galis’s fifth, was properly denied because Galis failed to state valid reasons why his present claim of ineffective assistance of counsel could not have been raised in one of the prior proceedings. Witt v. State, 465 So. 2d 510 (Fla.1985).
Affirmed.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Anders, 560 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…g of the entrapment defense and the due process clause are substantively similar. Some courts have considered them together, while other courts, when the defenses were raised separately, have considered the defenses individually. In Taffer v. State, 504 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA), cause dismissed, 506 So. 2d 1043, rev. denied, 511 So. 2d 1000 (Fla.1987) the defendant relied on Glosson and Cruz in his motion to dismiss. The trial court considered the two prongs of the entrapment defense (objective and subjective…
-
In re the Adoption OF Baby Girl "C" v. K.S., 511 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…od established by the legislature, and followed by the Florida Supreme Court, by which to determine in other contexts that issues are separate and distinct one from the other. Cf. Rotenberry v. State, 468 So. 2d 971, 976 (Fla.1985); Taffer v. State, 504 So. 2d 436, 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)). The adoption here would have been proper only if the mother had consented to it, i.e., if her child had been available for adoption because her revocation of her consent was not valid. This same type of conclusion was reac…
-
Dukes v. State, 503 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…or more criminal statutes ... [he] shall be sentenced separately for each criminal offense.” Separate offenses exist if each offense requires an element not required for the other. See Rotenberry v. State, 468 So. 2d 971 (Fla.1985); Taffer v. State, 504 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Each of the three offenses here clearly requires proof of an element not required by any of the others. There was no error in the sentencing. We find no merit in defendant’s other contentions. Affirmed. DANAHY, C.J., and BOARD…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Witt v. State, 465 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1985)