J. SCOTT LANFORD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NOMINATED TRUSTEE OF THE TESTAMENTARY TRUST OF MARY L. DILLARD
v.
ROBIN PHEMISTER, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARY L. DILLARD AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE TESTAMENTARY TRUST OF MARY L. DILLARD
J. SCOTT LANFORD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NOMINATED TRUSTEE OF THE TESTAMENTARY TRUST OF MARY L. DILLARD
ROBIN PHEMISTER, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARY L. DILLARD AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE TESTAMENTARY TRUST OF MARY L. DILLARD
280 So. 3d 79
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2019)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lanford v. Phemister (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)…tive or the testamentary trust’s trustee. Lanford did not appeal the probate court’s order appointing Phemister as personal representative, and we affirmed the probate court’s order appointing her as testamentary trustee. See Lanford v. Phemister, 280 So. 3d 79, 79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). ---PAGE 5--- not be used for these purposes. He also argued the amounts Phemister and her attorneys sought were categorically unreasonable. He contended, for example, that Phemister did not distinguish between the work…
-
Lanford v. Phemister (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)…tative or the testamentary trust’s trustee. Lanford did not appeal the probate court’s order appointing Phemister as personal representative, and we affirmed the probate court’s order appointing her as testamentary trustee. See Lanford v. Phemister, 280 So. 3d 79, 79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). 4 not be used for these purposes. He also argued the amounts Phemister and her attorneys sought were categorically unreasonable. He contended, for example, that Phemister did not distinguish between the work she and her atto…