RAYMOND WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1987-03-05
No. 86-1283
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
505 So. 2d 7 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1987)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a court cannot impose costs under section 27.3455 for crimes committed prior to July 1, 1985.


Facts & Procedural History

Raymond Williams was convicted of an unlawful sale of cannabis committed in February 1985. The trial court imposed a $200 fine pursuant to section 27.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.

UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.

Raymond Williams appeals a judgment adjudicating him guilty of the unlawful sale or delivery of cannabis, an offense which he committed in February 1985. Williams argues that the trial court erred in imposing a $200 fine pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). We agree.

In Yost v. State, 489 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), we held that a court cannot impose costs under section 27.3455 for crimes committed prior to July 1, 1985. We certify to the supreme court the same question we certified in Yost:

DOES THE APPLICATION OF SECTION 27.3455, FLORIDA STATUTES (1985) TO CRIMES COMMITTED PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE STATUTE VIOLATE THE EX POST FACTO PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OR DOES THE STATUTE MERELY EFFECT A PROCEDURAL CHANGE AS IS PERMITTED UNDER STATE V. JACKSON, 478 So. 2d 1054 (FLA.1985)?

See also Freeney v. State, 493 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Robinson v. State, 488 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Since Williams committed his offense in February 1985, we reverse that portion of the judgment imposing court costs.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw