SHELLMAN PETERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1987-04-07
No. 85-1582
Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
505 So. 2d 16 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions for first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm upon a holding that the claimed error that the trial court unduly restricted the defendant’s cross-examination of his accomplice was not preserved for review by an appropriate proffer of the intended testimony. See Silveira-Hemandez v. State, 495 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); A. McD. v. State, 422 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Ketrow v. State, 414 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw