DERRICK ALLEN WALKER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2021-12-20
No. 21-1366
343 So. 3d 91 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2021)
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …at if claim was brought as a Rule 3.850 motion, it would be untimely and successive. Id. Thus, the motion was denied. Id. at 1513–15. Mr. Walker appealed, and the order was per curiam affirmed on June 14, 2022. Id. at 1536; see also Walker v. State, 343 So. 3d 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Case No. 5D22-266. Mr. Walker's motion for rehearing was denied, id. at 1543, and mandate issued on August 5, 2022. Id. at 1545. On November 24, 2021, Mr. Walker filed a successive Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. (…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw