THE CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
THE PEOPLES COMMITTEE FOR COMMON SENSE GOVERNMENT, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1987-04-22
No. 86-2738
HALL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.
505 So. 2d 1116 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the Peoples Committee lacked standing to seek an injunction against the City's spending of public funds for advertising.


Facts & Procedural History

The Peoples Committee, a political action committee, sought an injunction against the City spending public funds to advertise its position on a refere…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.

LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.

The City appeals from a temporary injunction prohibiting the City from spending public funds to advertise its position on an upcoming referendum vote. We reverse.

The injunction was sought in a suit brought by the Peoples Committee for Common Sense Government, identified in its complaint as a political action committee organized under the laws of the state of Florida. We agree with the City’s contention that the Peoples Committee had no standing to bring the suit.

The Peoples Committee argues that in a suit like this no special injury to plaintiff of the type referred to in Rickman v. Whitehurst, 73 Fla. 152, 74 So. 205 (1917), and Godheim v. City of Tampa, 426 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983),1 need be shown when, as here, there is a constitutional attack upon a legislative body’s exercise of its taxing and spending power. See Department of Administration v. Horne, 269 So. 2d 659 (Fla.1972); Godheim, 426 So. 2d at 1087. However, a plaintiff in this type of case must nevertheless show, and the Peoples Committee has not shown, that it is a taxpayer and is therefore affected by the spending of tax money which it is challenging. See Department of Revenue v. Markham, 396 So. 2d 1120 (Fla.1981); Horne.

Reversed.

HALL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur. . See also North Broward Hospital Dist. v. Fornes, 476 So. 2d 154 (Fla.1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Barker v. Barker, 909 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
    …onfirm counsel’s representation that Hugh was currently unable to submit to the taking of his deposition. . In so doing, we do not establish law of the case on whether the Respondents have standing or stated a cause of action. See Bevan v. Wanicka, 505 So. 2d 1116, 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Allen v. City of Miami, 147 So. 2d 566, 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962) (explaining that declining to issue a writ of certiorari for failure ió demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law should not be conside…
  • Johnson v. Fla. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 542 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
    …d, 478 So. 2d 54 (Fla.1985). The successor judge erred in concluding that the previous decision on this subject was the law of the case. A denial of certiorari is not to be construed as an opinion on the merits of the petition. See Bevan v. Wanicka, 505 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Bing v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 498 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Accent Realty of Jacksonville, Inc. v. Crudele, 496 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1987); Don Mott Agency, Inc. v. Harriso…
  • Chandler v. The City OF Greenacres, 140 So. 3d 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …, 590 So. 2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). “[T]he Public Records Act does not condition the inspection of public records on any requirement that the person seeking to inspect records reveal that person’s background information.” Bevan v. Wanicka, 505 So. 2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Furthermore, “[a] requester’s motive for seeking a copy of documents is irrelevant” to the requester’s right to access the records. Microdecisions, Inc. v. Skinner, 889 So. 2d 871, 875 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (finding “the fact…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw