WILLIAM MATTHEW LAMPLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM MATTHEW LAMPLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
506 So. 2d 12
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
COBB, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence which was excessive because of an improper departure from the guidelines. See Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863 (Fla.1986). Although the appellant has served the in-carcerative portion of his split sentence, the issue is still viable because of the length of the probationary period. Cf Crews v. State, 502 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected sentence in conformity with the guidelines.
UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tri-W Steel, Inc. v. Miami Nat'l Bank, 546 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Cor v. State, 506 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzie, 502 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 511 So. 2d 299 (Fla.1987); Capital Partners Inv. Co., Inc. v. American Inv. Group, Inc., 500 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); St. John v. Kuper, 489 S…
Authorities Cited
- Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 1986)
- Crews v. State, 502 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
- Senior v. State, 502 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)